Not known Facts About bail case law on sec 337 a ii ppc
Not known Facts About bail case law on sec 337 a ii ppc
Blog Article
33 . Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally, the main objectives of your police is always to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and higher than all, make certain legislation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The regulation enjoins the police to become scrupulously fair on the offender and the Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court together with from other Courts, Nonetheless they have did not have any corrective effect on it.
Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Compact fees utilize.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the uncovered counsel to the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments since the issues on the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard towards the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(one) on the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession on the subjected premises into the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs for being decided because of the competent court after hearing the parties if pending since the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer inside the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this element for interim custody of the subject premises Should the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, along with the role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release like a legally regarded conviction. Read more
This is because transfer orders are typically considered within the administrative discretion on the employer. However, there may very well be exceptions in cases where the transfer is enthusiastic by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, They might have grounds to challenge before the suitable forum. Read more
Generally speaking, higher courts don't have direct oversight over the reduced courts of record, in that they cannot reach out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments on the lower courts.
PLR is usually a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
Because of this, simply citing the case is more very likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Visualize it as calling another person to inform them you’ve found their misplaced phone, then telling them you live in this kind of-and-this kind of community, without actually offering them an address. Driving round the community seeking to find their phone is likely to become more frustrating than it’s worth.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to your main case, it is also a well-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is subject matter into the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings around the evidence.
The legislation of necessity recognized and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it was the illegal action called regulation of necessity..
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance in the respondents that pensionary benefits could be withheld on account with the allegations leveled against the petitioner, inside our view, section twenty from the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does give for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension could be withheld or reduced. These consist of if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension might be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension might be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension might be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set by the government.
The different roles of case regulation in civil and common law traditions create differences in the way that courts render decisions. Common legislation courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale driving their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and often interpret the broader legal principles.
17 . Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 46 I have read the discovered counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as being the issues of the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard towards the interim relief application in terms of click here Section seven(one) in the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession with the subjected premises for the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs being decided with the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as being the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer in the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court must see this factor for interim custody of the subject premises if the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” aren't binding, but may very well be used as persuasive authority, which is to give substance to the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.